The Market

offer of the day – Jacques Prieur 2010…

By billn on January 26, 2012 #the market

Vins blancs
PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Combettes 75cl 66.00 Swiss Francs
MEURSAULT Perrières 75cl 99.00
CORTON CHARLEMAGNE 75cl 129.00
CHEVALIER-MONTRACHET 75cl 209.00
MONTRACHET 75cl 399.00

Vins rouges
BEAUNE Champs-Pimonts 75cl 29.80
VOLNAY Santenots 75cl 56.00
VOLNAY Clos des Santenots 75cl 69.50
CORTON Bressandes 75cl 109.00
CLOS DE VOUGEOT 75cl 118.00
CHAMBERTIN 75cl 179.00
ECHEZEAUX 75cl 179.00
MUSIGNY 75cl 249.00

Historical pricing (2009-2007) you can see here. It’s a strange combination of almost okay prices (Puligny, Volnay, Beaune) plus overly optimistic prices: but who am I to criticise if they sell(?)

closing the spanish campogate

By billn on December 07, 2011 #other sites#the market

A heart-felt piece here.

I always think wtf (sorry…) when I hear of Spain being an ‘up-and-coming’ wine-region; I mean, how lazy is that? It simply suggests to me that I can’t trust what the writer is going to type next. Ryan’s Catavino piece (above) simply paints a picture of a region (sorry, country) with wine-styles so diverse that people around the world haven’t the basic knowledge to buy a Spanish wine, and that’s clearly not helped by producers that have clutched in desperation at every available style, process and presentation.

The essential problem is that people think of Spanish wine as an entity, and while you might also hear the phrase ‘French wine’, buyers of French wine are usually buying Burgundy or Bordeaux (or even Loire…!) with a decent idea of what it will taste like and really don’t consider ‘French wine’ an entity. Most people would be hard-pressed to come up with a Spanish wine region other than Rioja – here’s the nub of problem facing ‘Spanish wine’ – Pancho might not have been the solution but he clearly wasn’t the problem.

Perhaps Spanish wine really needs a bunch of MW business-men and women, but with their hands more on their hearts than in the tills, resolute about each region they represent and able to showcase a consistent style in their region – without consistency they will continue to have problems selling their wares. The local wine critics need also to be a part of the solution; criticising Neal Martin (that’s even a Spanish name isn’t it?) as the WA’s new man in Spain as ‘biased’, because several years ago he had the gaul (sorry, that’s not in Spain) to publish his experience of several sub-standard bottles, is not really part of any solution is it?

Let’s see what happens, but the country has to offer engagement and focus if it is to be a success in the market – quality is only an entry-ticket to the game – with Neal Martin I can’t think of another wide-circulation writer who offers such opportunity for real engagement, but I remain worried about the focus…

[Yes I have a cold – maybe another day or two before I exercise my corkscrew!]

ex domaine wine sale…

By billn on November 21, 2011 #the market

Click on the image to get a (slightly) better view.

Domaine Ballorin have had some good press but I’ve no first-hand experience of the wines. It seems surprising, but the domaine seem to be having a ‘fire-sale’ – no they weren’t on fire – (at least I don’t think they were!). The only information I have is that ‘all the 2009s must go

I can’t be Morey for the sale next weekend, but maybe some of you can…
(if you can’t quite read the email address, it’s domaineballorin@orange.fr)

Gevrey-Chambertin and polemic…

By billn on November 19, 2011 #degustation#the market

First the polemic: what value have the established wine-press versus the ‘blogosphere’? And just for the record I hate the word blog, so blogosphere hardly floats my boat either – web-based journalism seems a better description – if it wasn’t so ‘wordy’ and self-important…!

Anyway, I’d seen that there was to be a press tasting of the Gevrey 2010 vintage in Beaune to coincide with the weekend of the Hospices auction; I immediately asked if it would be possible to get a place; eventually I received an email from the Syndicat Viticole de Gevrey-Chambertin asking me to register and also enquiring who I would be writing for. I turned up on the day (Friday 18th November) and I was on the list!

There were three tasting tables; villages, premiers and grands – around 90 wines, all from 2010 – there were plenty of well known vignerons too who would join us for a nice lunch whilst pouring some of their 2000s (10 years on if you like). Unfortunately, where were the press? Michel Bettane arrived, and floated around the room, shaking hands, but how many wines did he taste, and will he post notes? Actually Michel Bettane did more than most: I sneaked a look at the list of ‘attendees’ – four pages of spreadsheet with about 30 names per page – many in the list were from the UK, US, Nordic (etc.) MWs and press – and let’s not forget the French, there were many French names too; people who apparently took the time to request a place – yet only about half a dozen bothered to attend and actually test all the bottles. There were more vignerons than press.

I started this entry with the word polemic. Myself, Patrick Essa and Patrick Maclart worked each table and every wine, I’m pretty sure you will get three different but equally valid impressions, but these three people put the time in for their audience – and for anyone that doesn’t understand what that means, that’s the best part of one hundred thousand visitors per month. But what value are the traditional press when they don’t have the time or inclination to attend after registering? John Gilman, to his credit, arrived with about an hour of official tasting time left and was working the three tables hard – probably not enough time to complete the set, but chapeau!

My notes will follow in the next couple of days, but in the meantime my congratulations are due to the Syndicat Viticole de Gevrey; despite an apparent lack of ‘traditional interest’ their 2010s shone like beacons and I hope that they will not be disheartened – it was clearly an investment on their part, but at least they have a potential audience of one hundred thousand visitors per month – I anyway suspect that’s more than the traditional press can muster. It seems that ‘tradition’ will continue to whither – it’s just surprising how much it’s driven by the indifference of those traditionalists…!

More: [notes moved to here…]

offer of the day – Leflaive 2010…

By billn on October 28, 2011 #the market

DOMAINE LEFLAIVE 2010 – Puligny-Montrachet (En Primeur)

BOURGOGNE 2010 75cl 34.00 (2009 – 35.00) Swiss Francs
PULIGNY-MONTRACHET 2010 75cl 59.00 (59.50)

PREMIERS CRUS
PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Clavoillons 2010 75cl 79.50 (84.00)
MEURSAULT Sous le Dos d’Âne 2010 75cl 89.50 (89.50)
PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Folatières 2010 75cl 129.00 (118.00)
PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Combettes 2010 75cl 129.00 (118.00)
PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Pucelles 2010 75cl 155.00 (148.00)

GRANDS CRUS
BIENVENUES BATARD MONTRACHET 2010 75cl 259.00 (228.00)
BATARD MONTRACHET 2010 75cl 279.00 (248.00)
CHEVALIER-MONTRACHET 2010 75cl 345.00 (315.00)

The 2009 prices are in brackets after the 2010 price. Despite a Swiss franc that’s currently 9% stronger versus the Euro than it was this time last year, there are ‘real’ 10% increases at 1er and GC level – let’s call that a net 20% increase shall we(?)

The prices are edging nearer to their Swiss franc (2007 vintage) peaks – of course, the Swiss franc was 25% weaker when those prices were announced so effectively these are new ex domaine peak prices.

I expect Leflaive will point to lower yields, and the 2010s should really be very good, but I’m sorry to say this, but I see zero value here…

aoc beaujolais – still a bit of a mess…

By billn on October 05, 2011 #other sites#the market

Although Beaujolais producers have had the right label their wines Burgundy since 1937, it has long been a source of dispute between the two regions. Burgundy wine makers have been campaigning for tighter restrictions, particularly with the production of white wine.
Decanter News

BUrgundy and Beajolais continue their legal separation: Beaujolais (the former ‘Rhone’ part) has not counted as a ‘part’ of Burgundy for a couple of years now; yet the confusion continues. If they wanted a halfway-house, then why not (only) Bourgogne-Gamay(?) Of-course it works for the reds, but then there is still the problem of the whites…

Essentially, the solution is simple; Beaujolais is part of Burgundy so can use the label Bourgogne X, or it is not part of Burgundy so will have to use the label Beaujolais X.

Naturally enough, the ‘simple’ approach trashes generations of use and could impact the livelihood of some producers – either way, I still feel it a better approach that the current ‘intermediate’ (indeterminate!) approach.
[archive]

Burgundy Report

Translate »

You are using an outdated browser. Please update your browser to view this website correctly: https://browsehappy.com/;