I’m indebted to my good friend Jean-François Guyard to alerting me to this and I think it’s a sober reminder to always be circumspect about who is telling you what, and why !!

In recent months, we have spoken here several times about the increasing negative mood in society and politics towards alcohol and wine consumption. There is now new, concrete evidence on this.

As the magazine wein.plus reports, the recommendation of the World Health Organization (WHO) to avoid alcohol is based on studies whose authors are controversial. The two Canadian scientists Dr. Tim Stockwell and Dr. Tim Naimi, who advise the WHO , are demonstrably close to the organization Movendi International. Since 2012, this name has been used to refer to the Good Templar Order, which wein.plus characterizes as “an abstinence and temperance organization that campaigns against alcohol consumption and promotes an alcohol-free lifestyle” and Founded in the USA in 1851, Movendi International is now the leading global network for development through alcohol prevention. The organization is an official partner of the WHO and the United Nations.

“Many scientists reject […] Stockwell and Naimi’s motives and approaches. They criticize the two as protagonists of a worldwide abstinence movement that has been working for years to banish alcohol from society worldwide,” writes wein.plus. The accusations were also directed against the investigation and publication methods of the two gentlemen. Wein.plus quotes the British journalist Christopher Snowdon: “Stockwell’s approach to alcohol issues is refreshingly simple. If he wants something to be true, he says it is true – regardless of whether what the evidence says.”

British statistician Sir David Spiegelhalter from the University of Cambridge also supports this view. He told The Drinks Business magazine that statistically the overall risk of drinking a glass of wine a day to life expectancy is no greater than that of driving a car or eating bacon. Research confirms the health benefits of moderate alcohol consumption. “It annoys me when the harms of small amounts are exaggerated, especially with statements like ‘no level of alcohol is safe’,” Spiegelhalter told The Drinks Business.

When it comes to scientific studies, it is always worth questioning the publishers and their interests in order to avoid falling victim to zealots or lobbyists. This applies equally to both pro and con alcohol.

Thanks Jean-François…