FEED | SEARCH://
               Why Big Red Diary?

1985 gevrey-chambertin clos saint jacques…

I’ve seen some very ordinary notes (12/20) about ‘Cave des Dauphin’ wines – that was an old Savigny – in fact that’s all I’ve seen, I’ve no info about the name. I’ve seen wines under that name from the 1950s and as late as 1989 but know nothing more. A négoce? or perhaps somebody in Switzerland or Germany who bought barrels and bottled locally? I don’t know, but a lot of 1985 Clos St.Jacques and Beaune Grèves plus 1989 Bonnes-Mares was too tempting at an auction – how bad could they be (joke!)?

Well cosmetically how bad do you need? – the labels were virtually remnants. Anyway if you’ve any info, feel free to drop me a line or comment…

1985 Cave des Dauphin, Gevrey-Chambertin 1er Clos St.Jacques
The first task was successful – the cork came out in one piece. I poured a little and the colour was pretty good, and clearly as I swirled there was some viscosity – the glycerol clinging to the side of the glass. The first aroma was of soil but it was very quickly joined by dark molasses – very clean though. In the mouth this wine exemplifies why I see 1985 and 2009 as close cousins – there is depth, good flavour, ample sweetness and in this case a little glycerol-enhanced fat – what more could you want? Well maybe just the merest hint more acidity, but it’s nit-picking really! There’s still a little tannin if you search for it and a brown-sugar dimension to the finishing flavours. Clearly an ‘easy’ wine, but equally one that’s very easy to like and enjoy.
Rebuy – No Chance!

2 responses to “1985 gevrey-chambertin clos saint jacques…”

  1. Stefan Persili

    Hi Bill is it Cave des Dauphin or la Cave du Dauphin? La Cave du Dauphin were distributed by Caves Bujard in 1095 Lutry Switzerland a Negoce business who worked until 2003. Probably they bottled locally. Il send you a photo with the Label (Richebourg 88). I saw the price you paid for the auction lot, good price. The auction market here in Switzerland for older Burgs is not bad at all!

Agree? Disagree? Anything you'd like to add?