<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1995 dujac morey st.denis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/index.php/2009/11/1995-dujac-morey-st-denis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/index.php/2009/11/1995-dujac-morey-st-denis/</link>
	<description>updates and info for the burgundy-report website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:08:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/index.php/2009/11/1995-dujac-morey-st-denis/comment-page-1/#comment-37383</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?p=6704#comment-37383</guid>
		<description>Maybe you could just swirl more...;)
I probably can&#039;t muster courage enough to approach the de Vogue price-tag, but the Potel looks very enticing.
Thanks Bill.
--Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you could just swirl more&#8230;;)<br />
I probably can&#8217;t muster courage enough to approach the de Vogue price-tag, but the Potel looks very enticing.<br />
Thanks Bill.<br />
&#8211;Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billn</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/index.php/2009/11/1995-dujac-morey-st-denis/comment-page-1/#comment-37363</link>
		<dc:creator>billn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?p=6704#comment-37363</guid>
		<description>So what you&#039;re all implying is that I drink too fast, and really shouldn&#039;t finish each bottle in lesss than 1 hour?
:-)

Re 07 Amoureuses - just these two:
     &lt;div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2007 Comte Georges de Vogüé Chambolle-Musigny Les Amoureuses&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wine-searcher.com/find/vogue+amoureuses/2007/ANY/USD?referring_site=BRP&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; class=&quot;euro&quot; alt=&quot;try to find this wine...&quot; title=&quot;try to find this wine...&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;div&gt;April, 2009&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;div&gt;Not a wine you get to taste very often due to its relatively small production.  The nose is a little darker and starts deeper than the 1er cru, and is accented with rose petals.  There&#039;s a soft and welcoming texture and a creamy underpinning to the fruit.  Good density at the core. Flavourful, beautifully balanced and very fine.&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;br /&gt;
        
            &lt;div&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2007 Potel Nicolas  Chambolle-Musigny Les Amoureuses&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wine-searcher.com/find/potel+amoureuses/2007/ANY/USD?referring_site=BRP&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; class=&quot;euro&quot; alt=&quot;try to find this wine...&quot; title=&quot;try to find this wine...&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;div&gt;July, 2009&lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;div&gt;Wide, ‘tender’ aromatics that are complex at the core. Just a hint of carbon dioxide on the tongue. A fulsome impression without ever becoming plump or fat. A little fine-grained tannin. Very, very pretty wine – and just a little bit more complexity than some.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#8217;re all implying is that I drink too fast, and really shouldn&#8217;t finish each bottle in lesss than 1 hour?<br />
 <img src='http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Re 07 Amoureuses &#8211; just these two:</p>
<div><strong>2007 Comte Georges de Vogüé Chambolle-Musigny Les Amoureuses</strong> <a href="http://www.wine-searcher.com/find/vogue+amoureuses/2007/ANY/USD?referring_site=BRP" target="_blank" class="euro" alt="try to find this wine..." title="try to find this wine..." / rel="nofollow"></a></div>
<div>April, 2009</div>
<div>Not a wine you get to taste very often due to its relatively small production.  The nose is a little darker and starts deeper than the 1er cru, and is accented with rose petals.  There&#8217;s a soft and welcoming texture and a creamy underpinning to the fruit.  Good density at the core. Flavourful, beautifully balanced and very fine.</div>
<p></p>
<div><strong>2007 Potel Nicolas  Chambolle-Musigny Les Amoureuses</strong> <a href="http://www.wine-searcher.com/find/potel+amoureuses/2007/ANY/USD?referring_site=BRP" target="_blank" class="euro" alt="try to find this wine..." title="try to find this wine..." / rel="nofollow"></a></div>
<div>July, 2009</div>
<div>Wide, ‘tender’ aromatics that are complex at the core. Just a hint of carbon dioxide on the tongue. A fulsome impression without ever becoming plump or fat. A little fine-grained tannin. Very, very pretty wine – and just a little bit more complexity than some.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/index.php/2009/11/1995-dujac-morey-st-denis/comment-page-1/#comment-37352</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?p=6704#comment-37352</guid>
		<description>Recently enjoyed Bertheau&#039;s &#039;95 Amoureuses. Similarly to above, this was quite closed for about an hour, but eventually opened. Lovely and complex, plenty of grip and lots of life ahead of it. 
What are you&#039;re thoughts on 2007 for Les Amoureuses? Have you sampled any? I&#039;m thinking of spending all my hard earned cash on some, from say Potel, Bertheau, or Groffier?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently enjoyed Bertheau&#8217;s &#8216;95 Amoureuses. Similarly to above, this was quite closed for about an hour, but eventually opened. Lovely and complex, plenty of grip and lots of life ahead of it.<br />
What are you&#8217;re thoughts on 2007 for Les Amoureuses? Have you sampled any? I&#8217;m thinking of spending all my hard earned cash on some, from say Potel, Bertheau, or Groffier?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmcq</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/index.php/2009/11/1995-dujac-morey-st-denis/comment-page-1/#comment-37332</link>
		<dc:creator>bmcq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?p=6704#comment-37332</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s funny since I think of 95 as an overlooked vintage of value. Recently I had a 95 Roumier Chambolle that was hard and closed at opening, but then developed into a really nice, complex wine. I remember liking the 95 Vogue Chambolle and some other 1995 village wines from Mugnier, Barthod and Bertheau. 

I confess that I was dissapointed by a 95 Dujac Chambolle consumed a few weeks after this Roumier and found it flat and vegetal.

I grant that time may be gilding my memory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny since I think of 95 as an overlooked vintage of value. Recently I had a 95 Roumier Chambolle that was hard and closed at opening, but then developed into a really nice, complex wine. I remember liking the 95 Vogue Chambolle and some other 1995 village wines from Mugnier, Barthod and Bertheau. </p>
<p>I confess that I was dissapointed by a 95 Dujac Chambolle consumed a few weeks after this Roumier and found it flat and vegetal.</p>
<p>I grant that time may be gilding my memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billn</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/index.php/2009/11/1995-dujac-morey-st-denis/comment-page-1/#comment-37321</link>
		<dc:creator>billn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?p=6704#comment-37321</guid>
		<description>I do not doubt the possibility for a second Tom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not doubt the possibility for a second Tom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blach</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/index.php/2009/11/1995-dujac-morey-st-denis/comment-page-1/#comment-37311</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?p=6704#comment-37311</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re just impatient, Bill!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re just impatient, Bill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
