Archives
You are browsing the site archives.
2007 long-depaquit chablis 1er les vaillons
2007 Long-Depaquit, Chablis 1er Les Vaillons Pale greeny-yellow. The nose is a faint biscuit with a wider white blossom impression above, and is edged with a just enough citrus bite – just over the hour mark, the traditional salty impression of the sea-shore begins to poke through. Smooth, mineral acidity, slightly savoury impressions and this is really very long for a 1er cru. Genuine (not fruit-driven), great value Chablis, of the wiry and intense variety. Rebuy – Yes
fourrier 2001 chambolle-musigny
This wine was gorgeous, gorgeous, gorgeous on release. I would go as far as to say, that until the 2005 vintage it was easily one of the tastiest villages wines I’ve ever had the good fortune to buy. It wasn’t, however, all plain-sailing for my selection of 2001 Fourriers; my first Petits Vougeots was reductive and sullen – not great – though my recent bottle was a more-than pleasant surprise. Three years ago there was a disappointing Gruenchers that was volatile and not so pleasant – an aberration I thought. Earlier this year an American winemaker and burgundy enthusiast started to publish notes suggesting that his 2001 Fourriers were all turning volatile and needed to be drunk-up. I did of-course have the Gruenchers episode, but [....]
nice wine – now i feel so bad…
Yesterday evening I opened the first from a 12-pack of this wine, it had two specific attributes that contributed to my purchase of a full case; first it was a decently priced bourgogne from the 05 vintage which I could use as a bellwether to judge maturation of the vintage, but second, and a much sexier reason, it was in pretty 50cl bottles! For years I’ve kept a half-bottle limit to daily wine exploits – of-course gatherings are allowed to surmount that total – but if drinking alone, 50cl seems a still tolerable stretch, and, when drinking in tandem there’s still enough for a decent glass each! I suppose though, I should carefully consider the ramifications of this increased uptake; am I now inevitably on [....]
offer of the day – Leflaive 2008…
DOMAINE LEFLAIVE 2008 – Puligny-Montrachet BOURGOGNE 75cl 34.00 Swiss Francs PULIGNY-MONTRACHET 75cl 59.00 (69.50 – 2007 price comparison) PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Clavoillons 75cl 79.00 (98.00) MEURSAULT Sous le Dos d’Âne 75cl 86.00 (99.50) PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Folatières 75cl 109.50 (139.00) PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Combettes 75cl 109.50 (139.00) PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Pucelles 75cl 139.00 (169.00) PULIGNY-MONTRACHET Les Pucelles 150cl 283.00 (343.00) BIENVENUES BATARD MONTRACHET 75cl 209.00 (289.00) BATARD MONTRACHET 75cl 229.00 (299.00) CHEVALIER-MONTRACHET 75cl 295.00 (389.00) Versus the 2007 prices this time last year, these are quite significant price reductions, and for an even better vintage too (in general – I didn’t taste the Leflaives). So perhaps the reductions recently seen on the Henri Boillot pre-arrivals will actually be reflected in retail prices in a more general context. Whilst Leflaive [....]
2006 seigneurs de bligny gevrey 1er clos du chapitre
My first Clos du Chapitre, bought from the shop of the co-op Cave des Hautes Côtes just south of the Beaune periphique for €26.99. Seigneurs de Bligny is a brand/label of the ‘Caves’. This wine, in theory, is a monopole but there’s no such designation on the label – I asked someone at the ‘Caves’ and they said ‘we used to have monopole on the label, but now we’re not allowed!’ I suppose I’ll have to ask around to find out why. The coop is also one of the biggest owners of the next-door 1er cru of Craipillots which they sell for the same price – I thought I’d first try some of the ‘Chapitre’ first before returning… 2006 Seigneurs de Bligny, Gevrey-Chambertin 1er Clos [....]
2004 jadot volnay 1er clos des chênes
2004 Jadot, Volnay 1er Clos des Chênes Medium, medium-pale colour. The nose was largely absent for the first few minutes, only a slightly dense impression. Slowly it opens, eventually delivering wide, high-toned perfume that is clearly edged with the 2004 character – but here it’s character, rather than the oppression it delivers in many other wines. In the mouth this is very Jadot in its fine but narrow impression, born on super acidity – like so many ‘neither young nor mature’ wines from this producer. Fine, without power or intensity, yet there is subtlety and lovely delivery. For my own taste, this wine is as close as I can get to recommending, despite its obvious vintage character. Rebuy – Maybe PS A virtual prize for [....]
chablis, bernard ginestet (1990)
This is the second book from this series that I’ve managed to pick up. After ‘Le Montrachet‘ there is also (in theory) Chambertin, Clos de Vougeot and Corton in the series, but I’ve yet to see English editions of those latter three – if they exist(?) – but I continue my look-out! Whereas Jean-François Bazin authored the ‘Montrachet’ volume, this was written by the series editor himself, Bernard Ginestet. By this translator’s hand (at least) the writing is completely engaging, despite the age of the material – the original in French dating from 1986, and this English translation published by Longman from 1990. Ginestet wears his massive love for the wines of Chablis – ‘the golden gate to Burgundy’ – not only his shirt-sleeves, but [....]
2005 lamblin chablis vaudésir
In-tandem with the CERN large hadron collider (LHC), back again after a few days ‘rest’. Hopefully my annual winter cold is now already behind me and I can continue to polish my technique 2005 Lamblin et Fils, Chablis Vaudésir Medium yellow colour. The nose has hints of roast hazelnut, a little volatility, perhaps marzipan too, later I think it’s more high-toned, citrus fruit than volatility. A little oily texture, but a certain minerality too. Good balance then this wine’s peak selling point – a super burst of dimension in the mid-palate with a length to match. This wine is far from a cheaply priced grand cru, but has a lot going for it; it’s a decent price and it’s very, very tasty – nothing else [....]
abbreviation of content plus the high cost of false attribution
No bottles to open as I’m trying to rid myself of this damn cold, it also curtailed my domaine visit plans for the end of last week. So the net result is that the Autumn Report will be abbreviated versus my plan A – 120 2007 tasting notes from 2 tastings are missing, and also 2 domaines. At least I will could reschedule the visits for December, but too late for the ‘waiting’ report. That said I’ve no excuse but to ‘crack on’ and finish it – perhaps by the end of next week… Hi, I’m Matt and I’m… In a twist to that ‘personal ethics’ tale. I really do have the impression that wine writer Martin Isark earns as much from his legal activities, [....]
hospices de beaune auction…
I see that people were very enthusiastic at the Hospices de Beaune auction: New York Times
2003 (château) chorey-lès-beaune
2003 Chateau de Chorey, Chorey-lès-Beaune Medium, medium-plus colour. The nose has a ripe, macerating acid-red cherry centre. The fruit flavour is a mix of darker cherry – shaded much more to black. Good acidity and with a rasp to the tannin. A very nice dimension of good fruit in the mid-palate and quite okay length. Many of the most successful 03s come from the less vaunted appellations – here’s a perfect example that shows better than Chorey from most other vintages. Rebuy – Yes
hi, i’m matt and i’m…
This made me laugh today…
