<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 02 fourrier, gevrey 1er clos st.jacques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burgundy-report.com/diary/2009/06/02-fourrier-gevrey-1er-clos-stjacques/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/diary/2009/06/02-fourrier-gevrey-1er-clos-stjacques/</link>
	<description>the people, the place and their wines...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:28:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: billn</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/diary/2009/06/02-fourrier-gevrey-1er-clos-stjacques/comment-page-1/#comment-32261</link>
		<dc:creator>billn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?p=4115#comment-32261</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure it is Tom.  

I&#039;ve often found a note of &#039;oak&#039; on the nose which surprised me given his low use of &#039;neutral&#039; new oak.  That this reductive element was a little more pronounced than usual but in being so gave me the connection to my previous observations.  I&#039;m sure Fourriers never smell oaky if decanted for an hour - i.e. the reductive elements are chased away.  

Was anyway a delicious wine even when showing the note...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure it is Tom.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often found a note of &#8216;oak&#8217; on the nose which surprised me given his low use of &#8216;neutral&#8217; new oak.  That this reductive element was a little more pronounced than usual but in being so gave me the connection to my previous observations.  I&#8217;m sure Fourriers never smell oaky if decanted for an hour &#8211; i.e. the reductive elements are chased away.  </p>
<p>Was anyway a delicious wine even when showing the note&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blach</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/diary/2009/06/02-fourrier-gevrey-1er-clos-stjacques/comment-page-1/#comment-32260</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?p=4115#comment-32260</guid>
		<description>Is that reductive undertone the explanation for the impression of lots of polished oak sometimes given by young Fourriers? I&#039;ve often been surprised by this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that reductive undertone the explanation for the impression of lots of polished oak sometimes given by young Fourriers? I&#8217;ve often been surprised by this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

