<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Vintage Viewpoint (2009, 2008, 2007&#8230;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burgundy-report.com/autumn-2009/a-vintage-viewpoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com</link>
	<description>the people, the place and their wines...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: merchants&#8217; vintage 2008 en-primeur offers</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/autumn-2009/a-vintage-viewpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-38893</link>
		<dc:creator>merchants&#8217; vintage 2008 en-primeur offers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?page_id=6329#comment-38893</guid>
		<description>[...] for the usual (UK) January EP-a-thon&#8230;My most recent thoughts on the vintage can be found here, and I&#8217;ve already bought wines in both colours. Jancis has also just added a little detail in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the usual (UK) January EP-a-thon&#8230;My most recent thoughts on the vintage can be found here, and I&#8217;ve already bought wines in both colours. Jancis has also just added a little detail in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billn</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/autumn-2009/a-vintage-viewpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-38085</link>
		<dc:creator>billn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?page_id=6329#comment-38085</guid>
		<description>A big thanks for that David, I rarely get so far south ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big thanks for that David, I rarely get so far south <img src='http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/autumn-2009/a-vintage-viewpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-38082</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?page_id=6329#comment-38082</guid>
		<description>Bill,

Great report as always and a treat to get the 3 vintage comparison. things &quot;down sarf&quot; on the Macconnais/Challonais border are often different to the &quot;oop narth&quot; and we find that the 09s are eagerly awaited, (reds&gt;whites) the 08s are almost all instantly forgettable in whites and ultimately thiner in the reds with 07 being a cracker for whites and a little patience required for the reds to come around -  I&#039;ve found 07 reds to be a little lacking so far...obvious exceptions of course with Fichet and Guillot Broux.

The pouillys, Vergissions, Solutres, and St verans are stunning in 07 veering toward a less riper style than 06. I suspect the 09s to be lush again with 08s being the mineral vintage but I&#039;ve not tasted enough to make a really sound judgement yet....will keep you posted!

Ps we are around over the new year - ur very welcome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Great report as always and a treat to get the 3 vintage comparison. things &#8220;down sarf&#8221; on the Macconnais/Challonais border are often different to the &#8220;oop narth&#8221; and we find that the 09s are eagerly awaited, (reds&gt;whites) the 08s are almost all instantly forgettable in whites and ultimately thiner in the reds with 07 being a cracker for whites and a little patience required for the reds to come around &#8211;  I&#8217;ve found 07 reds to be a little lacking so far&#8230;obvious exceptions of course with Fichet and Guillot Broux.</p>
<p>The pouillys, Vergissions, Solutres, and St verans are stunning in 07 veering toward a less riper style than 06. I suspect the 09s to be lush again with 08s being the mineral vintage but I&#8217;ve not tasted enough to make a really sound judgement yet&#8230;.will keep you posted!</p>
<p>Ps we are around over the new year &#8211; ur very welcome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gough</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/autumn-2009/a-vintage-viewpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-37803</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?page_id=6329#comment-37803</guid>
		<description>Bill, big thanks for this, don&#039;t believe I&#039;ve ever disagreed much with your sage observations on matters a la borgougne but, based on my amateur grafting, during the CDN 08 &amp; CB 09 vendanges, totally agree with David B&#039;s comments entirely.

I always hoped cum thought the 2008&#039;s might surprise, not least the reds - but your description of the whites &#039;excites&#039; my acidity loving taste buds just a bit (and then some !!). 

Can&#039;t wait to try some of these. 

Re 2009  you are totally spot on with what I saw in my Pernand / Corton &#039;bubble&#039; in Sept - and we finished just before the rains came ! But, having been flamed on a certain UK wine forum (from folk who have never got their hands etc dirty in a vineyard ?) for simply reporting what I saw I&#039;m not going to say anything else except to wait for the wine to be in bottle and hopefully more than speak for itself ;-)   

Etienne, really look forward to seing you I hope at the London January 2008 tastings - most probably at Loeb&#039;s tasting ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, big thanks for this, don&#8217;t believe I&#8217;ve ever disagreed much with your sage observations on matters a la borgougne but, based on my amateur grafting, during the CDN 08 &amp; CB 09 vendanges, totally agree with David B&#8217;s comments entirely.</p>
<p>I always hoped cum thought the 2008&#8242;s might surprise, not least the reds &#8211; but your description of the whites &#8216;excites&#8217; my acidity loving taste buds just a bit (and then some !!). </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to try some of these. </p>
<p>Re 2009  you are totally spot on with what I saw in my Pernand / Corton &#8216;bubble&#8217; in Sept &#8211; and we finished just before the rains came ! But, having been flamed on a certain UK wine forum (from folk who have never got their hands etc dirty in a vineyard ?) for simply reporting what I saw I&#8217;m not going to say anything else except to wait for the wine to be in bottle and hopefully more than speak for itself <img src='http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />    </p>
<p>Etienne, really look forward to seing you I hope at the London January 2008 tastings &#8211; most probably at Loeb&#8217;s tasting ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bywater</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/autumn-2009/a-vintage-viewpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-37799</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bywater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?page_id=6329#comment-37799</guid>
		<description>A very fair assessment in my opinion - I think the 2008s will surprise a few.  To me similar to how the 2006s tasted - quite austere but with a certain glint in their eye.

I agree with Etienne&#039;s comments on the CDB v CDB - top Pommard is seldom surpassed even in the higher echelons of the CDN!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very fair assessment in my opinion &#8211; I think the 2008s will surprise a few.  To me similar to how the 2006s tasted &#8211; quite austere but with a certain glint in their eye.</p>
<p>I agree with Etienne&#8217;s comments on the CDB v CDB &#8211; top Pommard is seldom surpassed even in the higher echelons of the CDN!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billn</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/autumn-2009/a-vintage-viewpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-37792</link>
		<dc:creator>billn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?page_id=6329#comment-37792</guid>
		<description>Hi Etienne,
My comment comes as a lover of both Pommard and Volnay, and is based on my own triage experiences since 2004 - those Côte de Nuits guys almost always seem to get the better looking (less triage needed) grapes.   Not the case in 2005 and 2009 of-course.

So less Volnay &amp; Pommard to go-round (after triage) in most years, and &#039;easier&#039; to make good wines in the CdN, so maybe I should have said


&lt;blockquote&gt;the &lt;strong&gt;average&lt;/strong&gt; wines steadily improve in quality as you head north and into the Côte de Nuits&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Cheers, Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Etienne,<br />
My comment comes as a lover of both Pommard and Volnay, and is based on my own triage experiences since 2004 &#8211; those Côte de Nuits guys almost always seem to get the better looking (less triage needed) grapes.   Not the case in 2005 and 2009 of-course.</p>
<p>So less Volnay &amp; Pommard to go-round (after triage) in most years, and &#8216;easier&#8217; to make good wines in the CdN, so maybe I should have said</p>
<blockquote><p>the <strong>average</strong> wines steadily improve in quality as you head north and into the Côte de Nuits</p></blockquote>
<p>Cheers, Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etienne de Montillle</title>
		<link>http://www.burgundy-report.com/autumn-2009/a-vintage-viewpoint/comment-page-1/#comment-37791</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne de Montillle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burgundy-report.com/wp/?page_id=6329#comment-37791</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill, 

Curious to better understand your comments on Volnay and Pommard. In terms of quality (hail strom discounted), over 5 vintages in reds, I would say roughly that 
CN has the edge over CB 2 times (2000 /2001 /2006 / 2008 ?)
CB has the edge over CN 1 time (1999 / 2007 )
CB equals CN 2 times (2002 / 2003 / 2004 / 2005 / 2008 ? )

As for 2008 vintage, don&#039;t you think that it would be fair to disctinguish Volnay (hail) and pommard that are just delicious and had nothing to envy to CN 

when are you next in Burgundy ? 
would be good to see you
best Etienne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill, </p>
<p>Curious to better understand your comments on Volnay and Pommard. In terms of quality (hail strom discounted), over 5 vintages in reds, I would say roughly that<br />
CN has the edge over CB 2 times (2000 /2001 /2006 / 2008 ?)<br />
CB has the edge over CN 1 time (1999 / 2007 )<br />
CB equals CN 2 times (2002 / 2003 / 2004 / 2005 / 2008 ? )</p>
<p>As for 2008 vintage, don&#8217;t you think that it would be fair to disctinguish Volnay (hail) and pommard that are just delicious and had nothing to envy to CN </p>
<p>when are you next in Burgundy ?<br />
would be good to see you<br />
best Etienne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

